The CloseYou may know it as the financial close

Close evidence pack assembly

Collect reconciliations, journal approvals, checklist completion and review sign-offs into one indexed pack for close sign-off and audit requests, flagging missing items.

What to expect: ideas for what could change, what you need first, and how to test whether it helps. Nothing here is a measured result.

  • Impact: Medium
  • Ease: Medium
  • Prep: Some

Indicative rating based on the workflow described. Your readiness and implementation effort may differ.

Evidence status: Editorial / indicative assessment

What it does

This step still relies on manual effort, which holds back: Time to respond to audit requests; Missing evidence items at sign-off.

Who does what

AI prepares the work and suggests the answer. A person decides each one.

What it could move, and how you would check

Of the five measures below, this use case may help three. These are expected effects to test against your own baseline, not measured results. The last column says how to check each one.

Possible effect on each of the five process facts
FactExpected effectWhy
Process stepsNot directly addressedThis use case does not directly change the number of steps.
Cycle timePossible downstream benefitWork may wait less between tasks, so items can finish sooner.
Exception loopsPotential direct benefitFewer items may go back for rework.
First-time-right ratePossible downstream benefitMore items may be right the first time, with no one fixing or chasing them.
Cost per invoiceNot directly addressedThis use case does not directly change the cost of each item.

What you need first

This is an illustrative improvement approach, not a final solution design. The workflow, level of automation, integrations, and review requirements will depend on your existing tools, available capabilities, data quality, company policies, and team needs. Confirm these during discovery and a controlled pilot before implementation.

Ease of getting started: Medium. The tools exist. Some of the setup work is yours.

  • Evidence stored in consistent locations
  • Close checklist in use
  • Controller confirms pack completeness at sign-off
  • Pack retained under the retention policy

Evidence to keep

  • Indexed close pack per period
  • Missing item log

What can go wrong, and how a pilot would show it

  • Missing evidence not noticed
  • Confidential documents shared too widely

Your next step

Agree the evidence required for each close task. Store evidence in consistent, access-controlled locations.

The pilot steps are under "See how to test it" in the Ways to start panel. Paid support is optional: use Get implementation support if you want help.